Calls for new legislation to restrict family homes from being converted into houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) have been rejected by the Government.

It argues that authorities already have the planning powers they need to control the spread of HMOs.

Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook (pictured) was presented with a petition by Old Bexley and Sidcup MP Louie French, which was signed by 2,347 residents.

It called on the Government to introduce new legislation to prevent the loss of family homes through conversion into HMOs and also urged the Mayor of London to ensure the next London Plan protects family homes from being divided into shared accommodation.

Detrimental impact

The petitioners claimed the rise in HMOs was having a detrimental impact on local communities, leading to anti-social behaviour, parking pressures and increased demand on local amenities and services.

They also argued that existing council powers were not sufficient to prevent the loss of family homes and the over-proliferation of HMOs.

Responding in Parliament, Pennycook said councils already have powers to limit HMO growth through Article 4 Directions, which require planning permission for conversions that would otherwise be permitted development.

Proposals for new HMOs can be considered locally, in consultation with the local community.”

He said: “I note that Bexley council have already introduced a borough-wide article 4 direction to ensure that all proposals for new HMOs can be considered locally, in consultation with the local community.

“It is important that local areas have relevant, up-to-date policies in place against which any planning applications or appeals will be determined.”

Pennycook adds that residents’ concerns about the local mix of housing should be raised with the local planning authority and said the Government would keep its powers to regulate HMOs under review.