Measuring success

"This may seem a strange question, compared to some that I have seen you answer, but I would like to know how well my business is actually doing! I have a raft of figures and data but although it tells me how we are faring compared to our own previous performance, it doesn’t put my business achievements into a wider context. Any thoughts appreciated."

JULIAN SAYS…

julian-the-dilemmaManagement training tends, unsurprisingly, to focus on managing people, however it is dangerous to ignore the discipline of managing information that can assist in influencing performance in similar fashion to concentrating on staff.

management_training
Calculate performance and benchmark it against others.

As an industry, estate agency is fortunate insofar as there are whole swathes of data and statistics available. Despite this advantage, many managers are unaware of both the information itself and how to assess and use it. An investment of an hour or two poring over facts and figures relating to office and individual performance may appear superficially to be a waste of a manager’s valuable time, yet those who do so typically find it enlightening and rewarding as it often highlights areas of weakness yet to be identified. This allows appropriate action to be taken.

Fundamental management information within estate agency includes the valuation appointments to instructions conversion rate, sole agency strike rate, fee levels, percentage of ‘for sale’ boards on new instructions, instructions to sold instructions success, properties withdrawn without selling, number of applicants registered to mortgage appointments, number of viewings to offers, agreed sales to exchanges ratio, sales process time from offer to exchange and so on.

It’s alarming how many managers don’t know any of the above information – and occasionally don’t actually know where to look to find it!

Those that do know, or seek it out having been made aware of its importance, find it useful to benchmark themselves against other offices within their firm and other estate agents’ figures elsewhere in the country. We provide these figures without attributing them to any specific identified companies, as well as contextualising the figures against national averages – this information can help to establish a suitable target for the future.

MEASURING SUCCESS

One company for whom we have carried out a lot of training over the past few years had a valuation to instruction conversion rate of 37 per cent when we began our work with them. They had never measured this prior to our involvement, and with the appropriate training and support, they are now achieving 54 per cent so the bottom line is looking very healthy indeed.

Calculating one’s own performance statistics and benchmarking those against others have proved to be very useful exercises for a number of my clients as it allows them to place their own company’s  achievements into a broader context, and to readjust their aspirations as appropriate. Examples include an estate agency proprietor who explained with somewhat misplaced pride that his company sold 40 per cent of the properties they took onto their books – once he knew the context that there are firms comfortably achieving double that success rate, he realised that his expectations needed to be revised. Similarly, a firm who typically saw close to 40 per cent of their agreed sales fall through before exchange were surprised to hear that elsewhere 20 per cent and lower was not uncommon, thereby recognising the need for change and we provided the key players with relevant training which has led to a huge reduction in cancelled sales, thus securing extra income and happier staff!

Market and geographical variables mean that it’s important not to get hung up on the detail of the performance of agents elsewhere, but the bigger picture can be useful if analysed objectively.

Another firm who started to monitor and measure the aforementioned range of data discovered an interesting insight into their valuers’ performance. In one particular office, the primary valuer, who carried out the majority of the valuations, and was widely regarded as having an admirable appointment to instruction conversion rate was actually pinpointed as a weak link in the process as his instructions to sold instructions ratio was horrendous. The second valuer whose conversion rate was not as good was adding far more to the bottom line as a much greater percentage of her instructions were selling. Furthermore, she was securing a higher ratio of for sale boards than the supposedly ‘better’ valuer. Having identified these issues, the manager was able to tweak the way the office was run accordingly and to provide appropriate coaching and training support to the individuals involved.

Managers should measure, monitor and manage the information that is available – they may not always like what they see, but the lessons learnt are invaluable milestones on the road to success.

Julian O’Dell is founder of TM Training & Development


What's your opinion?

Back to top button