Home » News » Use of fake ID documents surges after fees banned for tenant referencing
Regulation & Law

Use of fake ID documents surges after fees banned for tenant referencing

London agency says its has seen a significant increase in criminals hoping to run brothels and drug dens or defraud Airbnb by hiding their true identity when applying for tenancies.

Nigel Lewis

tenant referencing

London prime estate agency Benham & Reeves says fraudulent attempts to rent houses using fake documents are on the rise in the capital as criminals attempt to defraud Airbnb, run temporary brothels and set up drug distribution dens.

The trend has emerged from the company’s tenant referencing agency, LetRef, which has seen the number of tenancy applications using fake identity documents surge in recent months.

Benham & Reeves blames the rise in criminality on the tenant fees ban, which prevents letting agents from charging tenants for referencing, and says the problem is going to get worse.

The 16-branch London estate agency says criminals have been emboldened by the fees ban, which means they can submit multiple applications for different properties in the knowledge it won’t cost them a penny, and that the landlord will foot the bill for referencing.

Tenant referencing

The company says the fake documents it has been receiving include ‘extremely good’ bank statements as well as passports, and that fraudsters are becoming skilled in creating documentation that will pass AML checks.

tenant referencing“This surge in fake applications is a very worrying statistic for a rental market that is already straining under the current requirements of a ‘Generation Rent’ and this increase demonstrates the importance of using a bonafide referencing company, where staff have been given specialist training from the National Crime Agency on recognising fraudulent documents,” says Marc von Grundherr of Benham & Reeves.

“Unfortunately, the majority of referencing companies do not even collect ID and proof of address and conduct referencing as a sideline, in order to up-sell other services and earn commission.”

 

July 5, 2019

One comment

  1. Just another unintended consequence of one of the worst pieces of legislation ever written.
    We are seeing a rise in applicants just lying on application forms even when the same question has been asked twice or more! yes we keep a holding deposit but more hassle and a lot less than tenant fees were; tenants have nothing to lose.
    Additionally landlords do not understand the rules; recently had a landlord phone us, after we had taken holding and started references, to advise that another agent had taken holding deposit and was also referencing (after us) and he would take “first past the post”! Could not understand the consequences had either of those applicants reported it!!

What's your opinion?

Please note: This is a site for professional discussion. Comments will carry your full name and company.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.