Lettings agency at centre of Rachel Reeves licensing debacle apologises
Harvey & Wheeler boss says sudden departure of staff member led to licensing application promise not being fulfilled.

The lettings agency at the centre of the Rachel Reeves selective licensing debacle has released a statement explaining why it did not apply for a selective license on behalf of the Chancellor.

Gareth Martin, boss of Harvey & Wheeler, who had declined to reply to press enquiries all day, has now said he’s apologised to the Reeves family for his oversight.
“We alert all our clients to the need for a licence. In an effort to be helpful our previous property manager offered to apply for a licence on these clients’ behalf, as shown in the correspondence,” he says.
“That property manager suddenly resigned on the Friday before the tenancy began on the following Monday.
“Unfortunately, the lack of application was not picked up by us as we do not normally apply for licences on behalf of our clients; the onus is on them to apply.
Certficates
“At the time the tenancy began, all the relevant certificates were in place and if the licence had been applied for, we have no doubt it would have been granted.
“Our clients would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for. Although it is not our responsibility to apply, we did offer to help with this.
“We deeply regret the issue caused to our clients as they would have been under the impression that a licence had been applied for.”
The explanation from Martin means the Chancellor is off the hook politically and technically, as she an now claim correctly that it is ‘her agent’s fault’.
But property licensing platform Kamma tells The Neg that under the Housing Act 2004, Reeves has committed a criminal offence. Landlords have a legal responsibility to license properties before letting them – not simply rely on agencies to advise.
If even front-bench members of the Government can’t get licensing right, what chance does the average landlord or letting agent have?”

Orla Shields, CEO of Kamma, says selective licensing has become an incredibly complex area and mistakes of this nature are a common problem.
“If even front-bench members of the Government can’t get licensing right, what chance does the average landlord or letting agent have?”
And there could be more trouble in the pipeline for the Chancellor. If they wish, Reeves’ tenants could now apply for Rent Repayment Order and claim back up to 12 months’ rent – potentially £38,400.
Reeves received some more good news yesterday. Southwark said it wouldn’t prosecute the Chancellor for non-compliance because she submitted her application for a licence within the 21 days allowed once a landlord or the council becomes aware that a property is unlicensed. The council has told The Neg it does not comment on individual cases.











The rental agent does not get licences for Landlords – that is a fact. Landlords have to get the licence – that is a fact. Reeves owns a property she is renting out – that is a fact. So she and her husband owe their tenant £41,000, plus £30,000 as a fine, and she bare-faced lied to the PM. As the ex-deputy housing secretary lost her job because a journalist found she had not paid £40,000 of SDLT, so I am thinking a Chancellor of the Exchequer should have an even higher level of probity and fiscal nous, which clearly if we add all of this to her CV failings must consign her to the backbenches. If a prince is stripped of his title for suspected failings, someone who lies to the PM, and does not pay a licence fee, and lands herself with a £71,000 liability is not the sort of person I want telling me how much extra tax I have to pay, because I do not trust her judgement.
If I offer a client help relating to a property issue and they accept that help they have the right to expect I will deliver ! The Agent involved has given a detailed response and I don’t blame him for not responding to the press . This is obviously Politically motivated and MPs and Party Leaders should be focusing on the real issues not trying to score points . She’s not fit for purpose in her role and neither is this current Government
She relied on Estate Agency Services and seems to have been let down by one of our own !
In other words, do as I say and not as I do