REACTION: Landlords to be hit with National Insurance on rental income
Rachel Reeves is considering taxing landlords’ ‘unearned income’ as part of her drive to fill her £40bn budget black hole.

The Chancellor wants to tax landlords via National Insurance on rental income in a move that could raise over £2bn for the Government, it is reported.
As Labour struggles to reduce its £40bn budget shortfall without crossing red lines on income tax or VAT, it is said to be ‘eyeing up’ the substantial amount of money locked up in property as a potential source of alternative revenue.
£2.18 billion
And, according to a report in the Times, the focus has now moved onto what Labour describes as landlords’ ‘unearned income’ – rents. In 2022-23, there was £27 billion of net property income, so if National Insurance was levied at the standard 8%, then it would generate around £2.18 billion, according to the latest figures.
It would mean that a landlord earning between £50,000 and £70,000 from their properties would have to pay an additional £1,057 in tax each year.
But because landlords already face increases in their costs and legislative burdens, industry insiders warn it could result in many selling up. Supporters of the plan argue that if the plan goes ahead, it would result in lower house prices, enabling renters to get onto the property ladder.
Working people
HM Treasury has declined to comment directly on the leak but said: “As set out in the Plan for Change, the best way to strengthen public finances is by growing the economy, which is our focus.
“We are committed to keeping taxes for working people as low as possible, which is why at last autumn’s budget, we protected working people’s payslips and kept our promise not to raise the basic, higher or additional rates of income tax, employee national insurance, or VAT.”
Industry reaction
Ben Beadle, Chief Executive of the National Residential Landlords Association

“Further punitive tax hikes on the rental sector will lead only to rents going up, hitting the very households the Government wants to protect,.” he says.
“It would come on top of last year’s increase to stamp duty on homes purchased to rent and proposals expecting landlords to pay up to £15,000 on energy efficiency improvements to properties.
“Analysis by Savills shows that up to one million new rental homes will be needed by 2031 to meet demand. Given this, the Chancellor should be using the tax system to encourage long term investment in new good quality rental housing.
“She should also heed the advice of the Committee on Fuel Poverty and reform the tax system to support investment in energy efficiency improvements.”
Adam Corlett, principal economist at the influential Resolution Foundation

“With tax rises clearly coming this autumn, the chancellor should use this as an opportunity to make the tax system fairer and more efficient,” he says.
“One way to achieve this is to ensure different forms of income are taxed at the same rate, for example, by levying national insurance on income from rental properties.
“After all, there’s no good reason why landlords should face lower tax rates than their tenants.”

Tom Bill, Head of UK Residential Research at Knight Frank
“Targeting landlords won’t lose the Government many votes, but such moves invariably end up hurting tenants,” he says.
“With landlords already selling up ahead of the Renters’ Rights Bill and tougher green regulations, another disincentive would reduce supply further and put upwards pressure on rents.
“Those that stay may pass on the extra costs in other ways. Governments need to fully appreciate that when you tax an activity, you get less of it.”
Marc von Grundherr, Director at Benham & Reeves

“This move smacks of political point-scoring rather than sound housing policy,” he says.
“Applying national insurance to rental income threatens to undermine rental supply by squeezing small and medium-scale landlords, who may pull up stakes or restructure.
We’re already seeing supply pressures in many areas, pushing costs onto tenants.
“A policy with such serious unintended consequences deserves more scrutiny and a strategic approach, not partisan theatre.”

Siân Hemmings-Metcalfe, Operations Director at Inventory Base
“Layering yet another financial burden onto landlords, at a time when the Renters’ Rights Bill is about to reshape the sector, is a move too far,” she says.
The focus should be on stability and encouraging long-term investment into the rental market, not short-term populism designed to plug holes in the Treasury’s coffers.
Policies like this risk deterring responsible landlords, which ultimately undermines the very protections and standards tenants are being promised.”
Sam Humphreys, Head of M&A at Dwelly
“The reality is that many landlords already operate on fine margins, and measures like this could be the tipping point that drives them out of the sector altogether,” he says.
“Once stock is lost, it is incredibly difficult to rebuild, and the people who pay the price are tenants facing rising rents and fewer housing choices.
“If the Government wants to improve affordability, it should be working to increase supply – not choking it further with punitive taxation.”










On what planet does Corlett believe landlords don’t pay Tax on their rental income ?
Landlords pay the highest rate of Tax amongst ANY business, courtesy of Osbourne who disallowed Business costs mortgage interest payments ) from rental income and expenditure.
The only consolation for me is that we won’t have to put up with these idiots for very much longer ! Our network base is in the North West and I can honestly say that both professionally and personally I haven’t spoken to one person who agrees with what this Government is doing in any way shape or form
The move by the treasury to disallow private landlords from claiming interest as a business expense against higher rate tax pushed most serious landlords to transfer their houses into Ltd Companies. The effect on tax revenues was negative as profits within a company are not taxed at 40 and 45%. Limited companies also act as a tax shelter for inheritance tax.
The other flaw in the treasury’s reasoning is that for landlords who have had the cost of borrowing balloon is that their profits shrink. No profit equals no tax payable. Every time a government adds costs to a business and tries to keep consumers costs down they lower tax take. Many small landlords are retired and not liable to National Insurance on their personal income. So I guess the next attack will be introducing NI on pensioners.
Rachel Reeves has absolutely no idea what she’s doing. I cannot believe that such an incompetent is in charge of the finances of our country. Truly madly deeply incompetent.
Landlords’ income comprises both a return on their investment and payment for the service of managing and maintaining property. To the economist at the Leftist Resolution Foundation who says there is no reason that tenants should pay lower tax than landlords, I say there is no reason that many sole trader landlords should pay more than double the rate of tax of any other occupation. Section 24 tax on income before interest deduction achieves that, and it drives rents higher. Many landlords earn less than the national minimum wage after tax and deducting the return on their capital.
The Resolution Foundation declares its mission is to improve living standards for low to middle income earners. If it were rational, the abolition of Section 24 would be its first objective in housing. This tax makes landlords among the lowest earners, and inflates rents. As it is, we can see that the driving force behind Resolution Foundation, and its friends in Labour, is not so much the improvement of conditions for low earners but a hatred of private property and business. These appear to be excluded from the worthy category “working people” which is Labour’s code for the those on the right side of its divisive treatment of the economy. I am sure every single civil servant is classed as a worthy working person, but those of us who roll up our sleeves, invest and put long hours into our businesses seem to be out of favour.
She will need a lot more than she raises to a) provide a home for those put out as the landlords sell b) pay the increase in housing benefit as the rents rise to cover this extra tax.
Sadly she is financially incompetent and everything she touches goes wrong we would be better with Dellboy in charge.
“Of all the blights on our politics, there are few more tedious than the left-wing campaign group that masquerades behind some poorly constructed frontispiece – The Resolution Foundation is one example”