Minister insists new warm homes rules won’t drive up rents
Official Government impact modelling warns some landlords may sell up or pass compliance costs on through higher rents.
Ministers have insisted plans to tighten energy efficiency rules in the private rented sector “should not require landlords to increase rents”, despite a government impact assessment warning that some costs could still be passed on to tenants.
In a written question, Conservative MP Paul Holmes asked the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero whether it had assessed the potential impact of the costs of new energy efficiency measures on the level of open market rents.
Consultation
Responding, Parliamentary Under Secretary Martin McCluskey (main picture) said the Government has “recently consulted” on raising minimum energy efficiency standards in the domestic private rented sector, including proposals for rented homes to achieve Energy Performance Certificate C (EPC C) or equivalent by 2030.
McCluskey said the Government has “engaged with landlord and tenant groups” in developing the policy and had set out “several proposals” to help landlords reach the new standard.
Our proposed changes should not require landlords to increase rents.”
He added: “Our proposed changes should not require landlords to increase rents. Instead, they will help tenants cut their energy bills by delivering more energy-efficient homes.”
However, the Government’s own “Improving the Energy Performance of Privately Rented Homes” impact assessment, published alongside the consultation, warns that some landlords could “exit the market” if compliance costs outweigh returns, while others may attempt to “pass costs onto tenants via higher rents”
The assessment also concedes that in 2023–24, around 32% of private renters already reported finding their rent “fairly or very difficult to afford”, meaning any further increase could prove difficult for households to cope with.
According to McCluskey, the consultation has now closed, and the Government is “analysing responses and reviewing evidence” on the potential impact of the proposals, with a formal response to be published “in due course”.
If this is such a good idea, why are owner occupiers excluded?
Simple, they think landlords are a soft target and filthy rich like MPs on £94,000 a year plus expenses and free first class rail travel.
What planet are these ministers on they have no idea of the damage this will cause to many properties and the PRS, to Tenants and to landlords, let alone us the independent agents. We already have issues with condensation problems on modern homes as well as older homes due to all the increased insulation already installed. Lofts are no longer any good for storage. Small traditional terraced houses do not have the capacity to have solar or heat pumps, fire places and chimneys have been blocked, for EPC ratings already. To entertain a heat pump you have to have cavity wall insulation as well as good insulation throughout to have any impact on energy otherwise they don’t work. Getting rid of log-burners and gas boilers what a great idea no sensible heating that helps with condensation and thereby mould, which of course is the landlords fault and not that of the tenants who live there and cause it and don’t accept liabilty nor manage it correctly. This will get worse and of course rents will rise due to this nonsense and the rest of the RRA. PRS tenants and landlords prefer a fixed term – the longer the better – this worked fine S21’s worked fine for all concerned when you are already doing everything right and your AST were solid and correct and adhere to best policy there was no problem. Yes I could go on & On but no time too busy sorting out all this shite!
That is about as out of touch with reality as it gets. I have many stone built rural properties which to bring up to a C grade at present will cost north of £30k so the landlord will spend £10k and go for an exemption. Most will have to take out a loan to pay all or some of the cost that could cost £100 pcm plus and you really think minister that will not be passed on?
Worse I know of a good percentage of those landlords who intend to sell if current tenants move out which piles pressure on an already insufficient rental stock meaning fewer properties and the basic rule of supply and demand will push rents up.
Cost of landlords buying new builds is too high with stamp duty what the country needs is for someone in Westminster to understand that landlords are not the problem they are a major part of the solution in housing.