Housing think tank says UK homes ‘worst value’ in developed world
The Resolution Foundation continues its campaign to persuade the public that the nation is in midst of 'housing crisis'
The UK’s homes offer the worst value for money of any advanced economy with households across the country paying more for less, analysis by the Resolution Foundation reveals.
A combination of high prices and old, cramped and poorly-insulated buildings means the UK’s housing is the worst value for money.
FLOOR SPACE
The Resolution Foundation used OECD data to compare housing issues with other similar countries and found homes in England had less average floor space at 38 m2 per person than similar economies including the US (66 m2); Germany (46 m2); France (43 m2); Japan (40 m2) and New York City (43 m2). And overall Brits get 24% less housing per person than Austrians and 22% less than Canadians.
The UK’s stock is also the oldest of any of European countries.”
The UK’s stock is also the oldest of any of European countries with a greater share of homes built before 1946 (38%) than anywhere else. Just 21% of homes in Italy and 11% in Spain were built before the end of the war.
Housing in New Zealand offers the second worst value for money, followed by Australia and Ireland – all countries also gripped by housing crises, it is claimed.
ELECTION CAMPAIGN
Adam Corlett, Principal Economist at the Resolution Foundation, says: “Britain’s housing crisis is likely to be a big topic in the election campaign as parties debate how to address the problems of high costs, poor quality and low security that face so many households.
“Britain is one of many countries apparently in the midst of a housing crisis and it can be difficult to separate rhetoric from reality.”
He adds: “Looking at home costs, floorspace and wider issues of quality, we find that the UK’s expensive, cramped and ageing housing stock offers the worst value for money of any advanced economy.
“Britain’s housing crisis is decades in the making, with successive governments failing to build enough new homes and modernise our existing stock. That now has to change.”