Do you? Majority of estate agents support mandatory qualifications
Two-thirds of agents back minimum qualifications, despite most beginning their careers without them, says GetAgent boss Colby Short.

Sixty-five per cent of estate agents support the proposed introduction of mandatory qualifications for professionals within the property sector, according to research carried out by agent comparison site.
It follows the Government’s announcement of sweeping reforms to the home buying and selling process, including greater material information requirements, digital property logbooks, and binding contracts between buyers and sellers.
GetAgent’s data reveals that while support for qualifications is strong, most agents began their careers without them, with 72% of respondents saying they held no formal qualifications when first entering the industry, with just 5% holding three or more.
significant uplift in reputation
When asked how necessary they believe formal qualifications are to maintain professionalism, 65% said they are either “very” or “somewhat” necessary. 72% also believe mandatory qualifications would improve public trust in the profession, with 37% expecting a “significant” uplift in reputation.
However, the findings also highlight concerns about the unintended consequences of the move. Two-thirds (64%) of agents believe that the time and cost required to achieve mandatory qualifications could potentially deter new entrants from joining the industry, potentially worsening recruitment challenges already faced by many agencies.
Beyond qualifications, agents identified “standardised data sharing between agents, conveyancers, and lenders” (33%) and “binding contracts between buyers and sellers” (31%) as the reforms most likely to impact their day-to-day operations.
The key is keeping the balance right – raising the barrier to entry without losing the entrepreneurial spirit that makes agency such a dynamic business.”
Confidence, though, in the overall success of the reforms is mixed, with just 21% believing they will “greatly” improve transaction times and reduce fall-throughs, and 42% saying the impact will be only moderate. Overall, 53% of agents believe the reforms will benefit the sector in the long term.
Short says: “Mandatory qualifications will help lift the baseline and give sellers more confidence in who they’re dealing with. They’ll also make it harder for some of the low-cost, low-commitment operators to enter the industry, which isn’t a bad thing if it helps protect the fee levels of those investing in their ability to do a good job and provide a great service.
He adds: “The key is keeping the balance right – raising the barrier to entry without losing the entrepreneurial spirit that makes agency such a dynamic business. Get that right, and everyone wins: agents, sellers, and the industry as a whole.”








Unfortunatley passing an exam does not make a good estate agent. Or anything else for that matter. It’s the first step into a career to give basic knowledge that can then be used. A degree in engineering does not make you an engineer, it just gets you an interview and you become an engineer with experience. You can also do an apprenticeship in most professions which is far more advantageous as it’s specific. Our business is the same. However the person at the back of the office should be qualified to ensure that laws are adhered to. I really believe that there are more issues with our business than qualification though. I recently had my Mum’s house valued by several agents and was quoted 26 week sole agency contract by a very large corporate agent. When I asked what the benefit to me was of signing such a contract she had no idea what I meant!! Service standards need to be introduced. If you are charging a fee for something then we should all have to produce a service charter laying out what clients an actually paying for. If the charter is broken you can cancel your contract. Simple! Clean up the business first before asking new estate agents to learn it.
Whilst I agree that some form of qualification may be necessary, I feel that experience needs to be taken into account also. In addition, the public need to accept that fees must rise and agents must stop slashing fees.