The Property Ombudsman
-
Features
Selling retirement property
Take great care when selling retirement property, to avoid accusations of neglect, says Katrine Sporle, The Property Ombudsman.
Read More » -
Features
Moving in
Moving in: make all the arrangements crystal clear or it can reflect badly on you, says Katrine Sporle, The Property Ombudsman.
Read More » -
Features
When is a flat not a flat? When it’s afloat…”
"When is a flat not a flat? When it’s afloat…” says Katrine Sporle, The Property Ombudsman.
Read More » -
Features
Be clear on selling fees
Selling a property to a tenant? Be very clear about the fees,” says Katrine Sporle, The Property Ombudsman.
Read More » -
Movers & Shakers
Mark McLaren joins TPO Council
The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has appointed Mark McLaren to the TPO Council. He joins following nine years with Which?, the consumer body. The role of the TPO Council is to ensure the Ombudsman’s independence, set the Ombudsman’s Terms of Reference and approve the budget. Part of Mark’s role also includes working on the Disciplinary and Standards Committee (DSC) to help deal with the small number of member agents who breach the scheme’s CTSI-approved Codes of Practice and/or fail to meet their obligations as TPO members. At Which? Mark was directly involved in the work that led to estate agents (2008) and letting agents (2014) being required to join an independent redress scheme. Mark is now a freelance Policy and Public Affairs Consultant and he will be taking over from Noel Hunter who left his role as Vice Chairman of the TPO Council.
Read More » -
Associations & Bodies
All change at The Property Ombudsman Scheme
After 13 years with The Property Ombudsman (TPO) – 12 as TPO Board Chairman of TPO, Bill McClintock stands down on 1st January 2016 and Gerry Fitzjohn, currently Vice Chairman, takes up the position. At a reception at the House of Lords, hosted by Lord Richard Best, guests, including The Negotiator’s Editorial Director, Sheila Manchester, celebrated Bill’s achievements of and those of Christopher Hamer, The Property Ombudsman, who is also retiring, having served the maximum nine-year term as Ombudsman. With 50 years experience in estate agency, Bill joined TPO as Chief Operating Officer in 2003, becoming Board Chairman in 2004. Bill (left) said, “When I joined, there were 769 firms with 4,251 offices registered with TPO. Figures now sit at 14,400 sales and 13,500 lettings offices – a significant change. One of my main achievements was encouraging the government to enact the Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Act 2007, which required all estate agents to register with an Ombudsman Scheme and to get the TPO Scheme approved by the Office of Fair Trading, considerable developments in the industry.” Gerry joined the TPO Board in 2000, from starting as a Sales Negotiator for Taylors in Stony Stratford in 1974 to National…
Read More » -
Associations & Bodies
Gerry Fitzjohn to Chair the TPO
The Property Ombudsman (TPO) has announced that Gerry Fitzjohn, the Vice Chairman of the Board, will replace Chairman of TPO, Bill McClintock, on 1st January 2016. McClintock, who has more than 50 years’ experience in estate agency, joined TPO as Chief Operating Officer in January 2003, has held the position of Chairman since January 2014. He will now continue as a Director of The Guild of Professional Estate Agents and Fine & Country, as well as continuing with interests outside work including his role as Church Warden at St John’s, Lockerley, which he has now carried out for 24 years. During his time at the helm, the volume of offices registered with TPO has increased from 769 firms with 4,251 offices registered with the property watchdog to around 14,400 sales offices and 13,500 lettings offices. McClintock (left) commented, “I have really enjoyed my time with TPO and shall miss meeting so many connected to the industry. I hope to have made a difference in some way, but now I’m looking forward to taking some time out. I would like to wish my successor and friend Gerry Fitzjohn every success going forward.” Fitzjohn, who began serving on the TPO Board in…
Read More » -
Features
Student lets can be a minefield, tread carefully
All letting agents will want to ensure that, when instructed by a landlord, they comply with the applicable legal requirements and the obligations set out in the TPO Code of Practice. However there are particular issues that are unique to student lets. It is important, when instructed by a landlord who wishes to let a property to students, to establish if a House of Multiple Occupation (HMO) will be created. www.gov.uk defines a HMO as follows: A property is a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) if both of the following apply: at least 3 tenants live there, forming more than 1 household each tenant shares toilet, bathroom or kitchen facilities with other tenants The property is a large HMO if all of the following apply: it is at least three storeys high at least five tenants live there, forming more than one household each tenant shares toilet, bathroom or kitchen facilities with other tenants. A household is either a single person or members of the same family who live together. A family includes people who are: married or living together – including people in same-sex relationships relatives or half-relatives, e.g. grandparents, aunts, uncles, siblings step-parents and step-children. Three or more…
Read More » -
Features
Honesty and evidence is always the best policy
Honesty and evidence is always the best policy” says Jane Erskine, Casework Director, The Property Ombudsman.
Read More » -
Features
Multi-agency fees and fairness
This case study concerns a dispute referred to The Property Ombudsman (TPO) from a seller complainant concerned about the fee that the agent (Agent 1) charged upon the sale of the property. The complainant explained that Agent 1 charged a multi-agency fee, as the property had been marketed by another agent (Agent 2). The complainant stated that Agent 2 was not instructed market the property for sale, and had confirmed that any marketing carried out by them was in error. The complainant also alleged that Agent 1 gave no prior indication of their intention to charge a multi-agency fee and did not advise that Agent 2 also appeared to be marketing the property. Agent 1’s response was that the property was marketed by Agent 2 throughout the period in which they were instructed, and that, as per the terms of their Agency Agreement, a multi-agency rate commission fee was payable. The facts I began by explaining that no complaint had been brought against Agent 2, and therefore I was unable to consider their actions. For clarity, I understood that Agent 2 had been informally instructed in the sale of the property by the complainant’s parents in 2012. The parents at…
Read More »